The Digital Colonization of Flyover States

Mar. 4, 2026

The diner in Wilmington, Ohio is the kind of place where the eggs are always too dry but nobody says anything because the woman behind the counter has been there since Reagan and that counts for something. Small-town economy. The money circulates like blood through a body that isn’t big enough to waste any. Then DHL pulled out in 2009 and killed eight thousand jobs and the blood stopped and the body went cold.

Seventeen years later, Amazon shows up with four billion dollars and a plan to build a datacenter on five hundred acres south of town.

A hundred permanent jobs.

Eight thousand lost. A hundred promised. Four billion dollars. Five hundred acres. A thirty-year property tax exemption, meaning the facility won’t pay taxes until the babies born this spring have babies of their own. That’s not an economic recovery. That’s a hostage negotiation where the hostage thanks the kidnapper for the sandwich.

A local named Quintin Koger Kidd — a name with more poetry than most of what gets published these days — stands in a housing development abutting the proposed site and calls it “the digital colonization of flyover states.” He’s not wrong. He’s not even being dramatic. He’s just describing what’s happening in plain English, which is more than the companies bother to do.

But Wilmington isn’t the worst of it.

In Port Washington, Wisconsin, three people got arrested at a city council meeting over a proposed datacenter. A fistfight. At a zoning hearing. In a town of twelve thousand that probably hasn’t seen this kind of rage since someone’s cousin said something unforgivable about the Packers.

In Ashville, Ohio, the mayor quit. Village of fewer than five thousand, and the person who volunteered to run it decided a Virginia company’s server farm wasn’t worth the death threats and the sleepless nights. When your mayor resigns over a zoning dispute, the social contract isn’t fraying. It’s already torn.

And in Saline Township, Michigan, the residents thought they’d won. Their elected leaders voted against rezoning farmland for Oracle and OpenAI. The people spoke. Democracy worked.

For about three weeks.

Then the developers sued, accused the township of exclusionary zoning, and a community of twenty-two hundred people — with a legal budget that wouldn’t cover parking at a Manhattan law firm — folded. Settled. Now a seven-billion-dollar datacenter is going up where corn grew last summer.

Fred Lucas has practiced municipal law for fifty years. He told The Guardian this is the most divisive thing he’s seen in half a century. “I wish I’d never heard of data storage facilities,” he said. There’s a weight in that sentence that press releases will never touch. Fifty years of quiet, essential work — zoning amendments, water rights, the tedious machinery that keeps small places running — and this is what breaks it.

There’s a scene in Steinbeck — The Grapes of Wrath, the chapter everybody skips — where the tenant farmers watch the tractors come to push them off their land. They want to fight. Want to shoot somebody. But there’s nobody to shoot. The tractor driver works for a company. The company answers to a bank. The bank answers to the market. And the market isn’t a person you can reason with or shame or put a bullet in. It’s a force. Faceless. Patient. Inevitable.

That’s what’s happening in these towns. They vote no. They file complaints. They put lawn signs in their yards and show up to school board meetings that were quietly scheduled for 7:15 AM — and if you don’t think that time was chosen on purpose, you’ve never been screwed by a bureaucracy. But when a company with a legal department the size of a small army decides it wants your farmland, your no is a speed bump. They sue. They invoke obscure statutes. They wait. Eventually your mayor quits and your township settles and the concrete trucks arrive at dawn.

In Wilmington, a tract of land near the proposed site jumped from under ten million to twenty-one million dollars in three years. Part of it is owned by a city council member who didn’t return the newspaper’s emails. Of course not. What would you say? “I got rich while my neighbors got a noise ordinance”?

The companies promise jobs and schools and infrastructure, and they’re not lying exactly — it’s that the math works differently than you’d hope. A four-billion-dollar facility employing a hundred people isn’t an employer. It’s an occupier. It sits on your land, drinks your electricity, hums through the night while the town that hosts it wonders where the prosperity went.

The same forces that shipped the factories overseas and left the rust belt to rot are back. Only this time they don’t need cheap labor. They need land and electricity and water. The humans are incidental. An afterthought. A line item in a community impact report that nobody reads.

Koger Kidd uses AI apps himself. He’s not against the technology. He’s against the way it arrives — through back channels, with tax abatements that outlast mortgages, and promises that dissolve like sugar in hot coffee.

The machines are coming to flyover country. Not to hire. To sit. The land is cheap and the political resistance is cheaper and somewhere in Wilmington the eggs are still too dry and five hundred acres south of town the future is being poured in concrete that nobody voted for.

The old companies left and didn’t look back. The new ones are arriving and they’re not even looking down.


Source: ‘The digital colonization of flyover states’: how datacenters are tearing small-town America apart

Tags: ai futureofwork automation culture ethics jobs